Does the new 19650 address the sector’s issues?
11 May 2026
Construction doesn’t have a dashboard problem: it has a PMO problem
27 May 2026
Do you understand what a modern programme management office should do? A properly designed PMO is not an overhead cost. It is a value multiplier, says Alex Lianos of Mace Consult, as he teases his appearance at day one of Digital Construction Week (DCW).
The construction industry has invested heavily in digital transformation over the last decade. We have more dashboards, more reporting platforms and more programme data than ever before. Yet many leadership teams are still asking the same questions: can we trust the information we are seeing, where is delivery risk emerging, and why are decisions still taking so long?
In my experience, the issue is not technology. The issue is that many organisations still misunderstand what a modern PMO is supposed to do.
There remains a perception across construction that PMOs are administrative overheads that create more process, more reporting and more bureaucracy. I believe that mindset is fundamentally wrong.
A properly designed PMO is not an overhead cost. It is a value multiplier.
“The success of a PMO is not determined by how much process it creates, but by whether it provides meaningful value to the client and leadership team.”
Alex Lianos
Its role is not to create process for the sake of process, but to create clarity across increasingly complex programmes, improve decision-making and provide the governance structure required to deliver confidently at scale. Good governance does not slow down delivery – poor governance does.
Too often, organisations implement PMOs without considering organisational maturity, leadership requirements or operational context. Construction firms frequently copy models from unrelated industries without recognising that no two programmes are identical. Some organisations require light-touch support and coaching. Others require highly directive controls environments across nationally distributed, multi-contractor programmes.
The success of a PMO is therefore not determined by how much process it creates, but by whether it provides meaningful value to the client and leadership team.
Too often, dashboards become performance theatre rather than genuine decision-support tools. The industry continues to focus on the visible layer of digital transformation – automated reporting, AI insights and predictive analytics – while overlooking the foundational layers beneath: governance, communication, data discipline, scheduling, risk integration and cost control.
Without those foundations, digital reporting simply accelerates confusion.
Traditional PMO models are not enough
I realised this while leading programme governance across one of the UK’s largest asbestos removal programmes. Surveys and inspections were taking place daily across multiple sites nationwide, meaning programme data was ageing almost in real time. Weekly dashboards quickly became outdated and leadership teams increasingly required live visibility and faster operational insight.
What became clear was that traditional PMO models were no longer sufficient for the pace and complexity of modern programmes.
“Too often, dashboards become performance theatre rather than genuine decision-support tools.”
Alex Lianos
At the same time, AI is creating both opportunity and misunderstanding across programme controls. AI has enormous potential to enhance programme management through predictive insights, automation and faster analysis. But AI is not a replacement for governance, leadership or delivery discipline.
If organisations automate poor processes, they simply create poor processes at greater speed.
Before construction fully embraces automated decision-support systems, the industry must first address the governance architecture that enables reliable decision-making in the first place.
The future digital PMO is therefore not a static reporting function. It is an adaptive framework designed to create clarity, control and strategic value across increasingly connected delivery environments.
On the Information Management Exchange Stage at DCW, I’ll be exploring some of these challenges further and discussing why the future of programme controls will depend less on producing more dashboards – and more on enabling better decisions.
Keep up to date with DC+: sign up for the midweek newsletter.
Story for Digital Construction Plus? Get in touch via email:
[email protected]
